There are several schemes for a store to sell a commodity, among which the one with the lowest price is (1), first increase the price by 10%, and then reduce the price by 10% (2) First reduce the price by 10%, then increase the price by 10% (3) First increase the price by 20%, then reduce the price by 20% (4) First increase the price by 30%, then reduce the price by 30% Which price is the lowest after price adjustment

There are several schemes for a store to sell a commodity, among which the one with the lowest price is (1), first increase the price by 10%, and then reduce the price by 10% (2) First reduce the price by 10%, then increase the price by 10% (3) First increase the price by 20%, then reduce the price by 20% (4) First increase the price by 30%, then reduce the price by 30% Which price is the lowest after price adjustment


It is suggested that you reduce the price first in the form of activities, and increase your price by 10% in the form of restoring the original price later



There are three ways for a store to sell a commodity
1. First raise the price by 10%, then reduce the price by 10%
2. First reduce the price by 10%, then increase the price by 10%
3. First raise the price by 20%, then reduce the price by 20%
Is the price adjustment result of the three schemes the same?
If it's a good answer,
I'll add points


Let the original price be a
In the first case:
a(1+0.1)(1-0.1)=0.99a
The second situation
a(1-0.1)(1+0.1)=0.99a
The third situation
a(1+0.2)(1-0.2)=0.96a



In order to deal with the international financial crisis, Jinlianhua supermarket has the following plans when dealing with a certain commodity: ① increase the price by 20%, and then reduce the price by 20%; ② reduce the price by 20%, and then increase the price by 20%; ③ increase the price by 15%, and then reduce the price by 15%? What kind of price adjustment scheme do you suggest the supermarket should adopt?


Suppose the original price of this commodity is a yuan, then ① (1 + 20%) (1-20%) a = 0,96a; ② (1-20%) (1 + 20%) a = 0,96a; ③ (1 + 15%) (1-15%) a = 0,9775a; therefore, the price adjustment result does not restore the original price. Because 0,9775a > 0,96a, it is suggested that supermarkets should adopt the third price adjustment method