How can prepositions in attributive clauses be divided into advance and not in advance This is the question about which weve had so much discussion. Have you met the person that he was speaking about. This is the question which has so much discussion about Please wait for me?

If it is a fixed verb phrase, the preposition in the phrase cannot be advanced. If it is not a fixed phrase, the preposition can be advanced!
1. In English attributive clauses, there is such a grammar as preposition + which, but without preposition + that, you can only use which if you want to advance the preposition
2. This is the question which we have so much discussion about!
3. Please wait for me!
I hope I can help you!

What is the meaning of preposition advance in attributive clause?

For example: the man to whom I refer is a teacher

Two problems about preposition advance in attributive clause
The first sentence
he is the man on whom I think you can depend
Does the on here have to be advanced? Can I think he is the man you can depend on on? Can't it be regarded as a fixed combination or he is the man I think you can depend on on on
Is this the man you spoke of
Why is of not prepositive here?

1. You can say he is the man who / who / (that, can be omitted) I think you can depend on on. If on is in advance, it can only be he is the man who I think you can depend on
2. Is this the man of whom you spoke of? Is this the man (that can be omitted) you spoke of? Of course, you can also advance of, that is to say: is this the man of whom you spoke?

Which preposition of attributive clause in English
Example:
There was not a small house in the village (to which )
he had not brought food and comfort.
The role of to in (),
How to say it,
When I do this kind of questions myself, it's not easy to judge whether prepositions should be used or not,
When prepositions are needed, which one should be used (like what of / in / on / to which, etc., and prepositional relative pronouns / relative adverbs)

This is not the house in the village (which) he liked.Like This is the house in the village (in which) he used to live.Liv ...

The attributive clause of preposition + which in English
The fantastic achievements of modern techonology and the speed at which scientific discoveries are traslating into techonological applications attest to the triumph of human endeavor.
Why use at which in this sentence
I remember that prepositions should be judged from the following clauses. How can the at be judged?
In fact, this is a problem of correcting mistakes. When I changed it, I just removed at
I was thinking of at the speed, but shouldn't we judge the preposition from the lack of the following clause?
For example
There are occasions when （on which） one must yield.　
Beijing is the place where（in which） I was born.　
Because yield and born are intransitive verbs, prepositions should be added. Can we see it from the previous sentence? Because I don't think there are few elements in the sentence if at is removed? I'm confused

The choice of leading words in attributive clauses mainly depends on what elements the antecedent does in the attributive clause or what elements are missing in the attributive clause. But when there is a preposition, it is easy to be confused only by the elements of the clause. It depends on the antecedent. Generally, the judgment of preposition can be based on the commonly used "prepositional phrase", When you use a preposition, see if it matches the antecedent properly,
There are occasions when (on which) one must yield
Beijing is the place where（in which） I was born.in the place,in Beijing.
For your topic, at the speed, if you don't use prepositions, how do you use antecedents?

Is the preposition of attributive clause + which = that in English

No
generally speaking
where=in+which
when=during+which
why=for+which
That can't be used in attributive clauses guided by relative adverbs

How to analyze prepositions in attributive clauses? Are prepositions before relative pronouns determined by predicate phrases or antecedents in relative clauses?
For example: 1. The goals (for) which he had fought all his life are quite important to him
2. It is useful to be able to predict the extension (to) which a price change will affect supply and demand

The preposition before the relative pronoun is determined by the predicate of the attributive clause
For example, the first question: fight for
&Question 2: affect to
The man to whom you talked is my teacher
&Nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; talk to
It's all fixed
Ensure accuracy~

Attributive clauses judge antecedents
Here is an example, which I heard at nurses' convention, of a story which works well because the audience all shared the same view of doctors, Great Xia, who can teach me how to judge whether an attributive clause is a modifier? Especially when the position of the attributive clause is not next to the antecedent, the advantage is placed in front of the word, and something is inserted in the middle of the advantage. It's really hard to judge?
But the answer is which two modify the story together

Here is an example, which I heard at nurses' convention, of a story which works well because the audience all shared the same view of doctors

In attributive clause, if the antecedent is a noun indicating place
If the antecedent is the logical object of the attributive clause, then the leading word of the attributive clause can be "with that"
If the antecedent is the adverbial of place in the attributive clause, the leading word can only be where
How to distinguish a logical object from a place adverbial?
How to distinguish I still remember the school_ wevisited yesterday.
I still remember the school_ we stadied in many years ago.

What does the antecedent do in the clause
If you are the subject or object in a clause, you don't use adverbials such as where, why, etc
If it is an adverbial of place in a clause, use where
If it is an adverbial of reason in a clause, why
1. I still remember the school which we visited yes
2. I still remember the school where we studied in (intransitive verb) many years ago
In the first sentence, there is no object in the clause
There is no adverbial of place in the second clause

What is the antecedent of this attributive clause?
The Great Wall is the longest wall that has ever existed in the world?
Is it a wall or a great wall
It's not that the relative pronoun follows the antecedent?

The antecedent is the Great Wall, has ever existed in the world

How can prepositions in attributive clauses be divided into advance and not in advance This is the question about which weve had so much discussion. Have you met the person that he was speaking about. This is the question which has so much discussion about Please wait for me?