The time taken for an object to fall freely after the last 200 meters is 4 seconds, then what is the falling time and total height of the object

The time taken for an object to fall freely after the last 200 meters is 4 seconds, then what is the falling time and total height of the object

Let the initial velocity of the last 200m fall be V, and take g = 10m / S ^ 2, then the formula is as follows:
vt+0.5gt^2=S
4v+0.5*10*4*4=200
v=30m/s
The total falling time can be calculated:
T=t1+t2
T=v/g+t2
T=30/10+4=7s
Calculate the total height:
H=0.5gT^2
H=0.5*10*7*7=245m

For free falling objects, the ratio of time taken to fall to the same height from the starting point is () The answer is (root 2 + 1): 1

First H = 1 / 2gt1 ^ 2 T1 = root (2H / g)
Second H = VT + 1 / 2GT ^ 2 v = GT1 = root (2GH)
T = 2 + 1 times root (2H / g)

A small ball, free fall Finally, he will move in a straight line at a uniform speed, and the acceleration is 0 Gravity is now equal to air resistance If gravity does not change, it can be seen that the air resistance is increasing all the time Why does the air resistance increase in the process of free fall?

When the free falling body moves, the falling speed of the object is directly proportional to time, and the air resistance is directly proportional to the third power of the speed. Therefore, the air resistance of the free falling body becomes larger and larger until the deceleration generated by the resistance and the gravitational acceleration balance. At this time, the free falling body maintains a constant speed, and the air resistance is a constant. However, because the resistance coefficient between the object and the air is very small, In the earth's gravity field, the latter cannot happen

Is it true that a particle is an idealized model and has no practical significance

A particle is an idealized model
Meaningless, wrong
When the shape and size of an object have little effect on the problem we study, we can regard the object as a particle

"Particle is an idealized model, which has no practical significance." why is this sentence wrong?

Particle is an idealized model, but it has practical significance. Although it is simulated and does not exist, it is convenient for us to study the influence of this material that can ignore mass and volume on other objects!

"Particle" in physics is an idealized model. When studying the motion of the following objects, it can be regarded as a particle () A. To study the over stroke movement of athletes in high jump B. Study the rotation of the earth C. Calculate the ship's speed in the ocean D. Study the receiving and serving technology of table tennis

A. The study of athletes' pole crossing action in high jump can not be regarded as a particle, otherwise it will be impossible to study the action. So a is wrong
    B. When studying the rotation of the earth, it can not be regarded as a particle
    C. When calculating the speed of a ship in the ocean, it can be regarded as a particle, so C is correct
    D. When studying the receiving and serving technique of table tennis, we can't regard it as a particle, otherwise there will be no rotation, so D is wrong
Therefore: C