Will the measured speed of light be faster than the actual speed? The first thing to say is that my idea is definitely wrong, but I really don't know what is wrong, so I want to discuss it with you. Anyone who is interested can say two sentences If the distance between the earth and the sun is s, and we know that the time required for light to pass from the sun to the earth is t, then we can calculate the speed of light as S / T = C, but due to the tardiness effect, the distance between the earth and the sun will be reduced to s', so the calculated speed of light is v = s' / T, because s'

Will the measured speed of light be faster than the actual speed? The first thing to say is that my idea is definitely wrong, but I really don't know what is wrong, so I want to discuss it with you. Anyone who is interested can say two sentences If the distance between the earth and the sun is s, and we know that the time required for light to pass from the sun to the earth is t, then we can calculate the speed of light as S / T = C, but due to the tardiness effect, the distance between the earth and the sun will be reduced to s', so the calculated speed of light is v = s' / T, because s'

You are using Einstein's relativity formula. Einstein didn't consider the problem of measuring velocity at all, so Einstein's conclusion needs to be corrected on this problem
We must think that time is an absolute quantity independent of the outside world in order to measure the speed of light. How can we assume that time and length change to keep the speed of light unchanged? This is a wrong assumption
If we don't use Einstein's formula, this problem doesn't exist. It's so simple