We say "two numbers subtract, the difference is less than the subtracted". After learning rational numbers, is this still true? For example
No, because if it is: a number minus a negative number, then it is equal to the opposite of the negative number
For example: 5 - (- 5) = 5 + 5 = 10
10>5
So it doesn't work
Is the sum of two rational numbers greater than one of them
If you add a negative number or 0, it's not >
Is 1 / 3 rational
Of
Is 1 / 3 rational? Why
Of
Mn is two points on the number axis, which represent rational number - 2,4,1 and 3 / 5 respectively, then the rational number represented by the midpoint a of the line Mn is______ .
You mean - 2.4 and 1 and 3 / 5, right?
If yes
1 and 3 / 5 = 1.6
Then the coordinates of the midpoint a are [1.6 - (- 2.4)] / 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
To know that a is a rational number 1: if the opposite number of a is a, find the value of a 2:10a must be greater than a? Give the reason
Otherwise I won't be able to sleep
If the opposite number of a is a, then a = 0
10A is not necessarily greater than 0
When a = 0, 10a = a
a
It is known that three mutually unequal rational numbers can be written as 0, a, B, or 1, B of a, a + B, and a is greater than B. find the value of a, B
From the known
(1) If a + B = 0, then B = 1, a = - 1
(2) If B / a = 0, then B = 0 does not hold
So to sum up, a = - 1, B = 1
New definition calculation (a △ B = 10A power X 10B power) verification: (m △ n) △ P is equal to m △ (n △ P)
And so on
(m△n)△p=m△(n△p)=10^(m+n+p)
According to the definition of ζ - N, it is proved that the limit of N / (the nth power of a) is equal to 0
According to the definition of ζ - N, it is proved that the limit of N / (the nth power of a) is equal to 0
Note: (definition of ζ - n) let {an} be a sequence of numbers and a be a definite number. For any given positive number ζ, there is always a positive number n, such that when n > n there is an-a
Your topic should be "a" a "a" a "a" a "a" a "a" a "a" a "a" a "a" a "a" is a N-power, a ^ a square of a, a square of a, and C (m, n) represents the number of combinations that choose m from n objects. For n > 1, we have the following: for n > 1, we have the following: |n / A ^ n / A ^ n / A ^ n |a | n = n = n / [1 + (|||||??-1-1) / [(2 / [(n-2) / [(n-2) / [(n-2 / [(n-2) / [(n-2) / [(n-2) / [(n-2) [(n-2) [(n 1) (| - 1) ^] < zeta, As long as n > 1 + 2 / zeta (| a | - 1) ^, we can choose a natural number larger than 1 + 2 / zeta (| a | - 1) ^ as n (this can always be done), then when n > n, there will be | n / A ^ n | < 2 / [(n-1) (| a | - 1) ^] < zeta?
If we define a new operation "*" and a * b = B power of a - a power of B, then 4 * (3 * 2)?
4*(3*2)
=4 * (2 of 3-3 of 2)
=4*(9-8)
=4*1
=Power 1 of 4 - power 4 of 1
=4-1
=3