Why is the proposition "when limx →∞ f (x) = 0, there is x > 0, when x > x, f (x) is bounded" wrong?

Why is the proposition "when limx →∞ f (x) = 0, there is x > 0, when x > x, f (x) is bounded" wrong?

When x tends to + ∞, limf (x) = 0. According to the definition of limit, for any ε > 0, there exists x > 0, such that when x > x, | f (x)|