Is a large amount of countable or uncountable What else can be used to modify countable or uncountable?

Is a large amount of countable or uncountable What else can be used to modify countable or uncountable?


Uncountable
Remember that amount always modifies uncountable nouns



Usage of a large amount of


a large amount of
Basic translation
A large number of (followed by uncountable nouns)
Network interpretation
A large amount of



Are numbers of and a number of followed by countable plural nouns? Are they different


There is no difference. You can't add uncountable nouns. You can only add plural nouns



Is the Olympic Games the subject and the predicate singular or plural?
If there is a year limit, is it singular or plural


As you know, the Olympic Games are allowed to have started in 776
If it refers to the Olympic Games, it is singular; if it is a sport, it is plural. The key depends on what you want to express. If you add the year, it is singular



The 2008 Olympic Games (hold) in Beijing


Singular number
was held



Should the predicate verb of the Olympic Games be singular or plural
Why do different questions have different answers


Singular, especially the Olympic Games, games is a fixed usage



There_____ A large number of books in the school library?
A.is B.have C.has D.are
Which of the four should be filled in, why, and what does this sentence mean after filling in?


D. . a large number of
There are many books in the school library



The plural of one of + countable nouns in the subject sentence and the predicate in the subordinate sentence are different. What's the difference!


One of my friends is Li Ping. One of my friends is Li Ping. One of my friends is Li Ping. One of my friends is Li Ping. One of my friends is Li Ping



The usage of the only one of
Linda is easy to recognize as she's the only one of women who ( )evening dress.
A、wear B、wears C、has worn D、had worn


B、wears
If it's one of women who, it should be wear



In the attributive clause, can we add who leading attributive clause after the only one of


When the antecedent is modified by the only, the very, only that