The resultant force of each force on an object moving in a uniform circular motion must be a centripetal force Why is it wrong

The resultant force of each force on an object moving in a uniform circular motion must be a centripetal force Why is it wrong

Centripetal force itself is not a force. We can only say what provides centripetal force, not what force is centripetal force

Must the resultant force on an object moving in a uniform circular motion be a centripetal force

By all means

Why can friction provide centripetal force? Why does the car need centripetal force when turning? Why is the external force equal to the external force when an object moves in a uniform circular motion Centripetal force required?

Because the speed is a vector, when the car turns at a constant speed, the direction of the speed vector changes and produces acceleration (note that the size of the speed remains unchanged when generating this acceleration). For the sake of good hearing, physicists call this acceleration centripetal acceleration. At the same time, according to Niu er's law, the mass multiplied by the acceleration is equal to the combined external force acting on the object

Why is it wrong that the acceleration of an object in circular motion must point to the center of the trajectory? Such as title

The acceleration of an object in circular motion must point to the center of the track. This sentence is wrong. The acceleration of an object in uniform circular motion must point to the center of the track. The acceleration of an object in variable speed circular motion must not point to the center of the track. The normal acceleration ay, only changes the speed direction, does not change

Uniform circular motion, the speed changes, why? For example, when a car accelerates on a straight road, the speed changes, but the direction does not change!

Did you talk about this on the second day of junior high school?
Speed is divided into size and direction
In uniform circular motion, the speed is constant because it is uniform
But the direction of velocity is always tangent to the radius, so it is changing all the time
Therefore, the change of velocity in uniform circular motion is actually the change of velocity direction

Why do we say that uniform circular motion is a variable acceleration motion, the speed has not changed, but only the direction. Why is it still an accelerated motion

When there is acceleration, we call it variable speed motion
Speed is a vector. Any change in size and direction indicates a change in speed
The change of speed does have the theory of increase and decrease, but I don't know how much change can be collectively referred to as "increment". For decrease, the increment is negative. For example, there is also the theory of "negative growth" in life
Similarly, I don't know about the change of speed. Sometimes it is collectively referred to as "variable acceleration", which is just a saying