Is the predicate of the amount of singular or plural I know the predicate of the number of is singular What about the amount of

Is the predicate of the amount of singular or plural I know the predicate of the number of is singular What about the amount of

When the number of + is the subject, it is followed by the singular
When a number of + is the subject, the predicate after it is in the plural
The amount of usage is the same as above
It's also singular
It's also odd
Represents a "quantity" or "amount", although the following number is often greater than 1.
e.g. The amount of the money is $100.
The singular modifier is not a noun
The amount of unemployed capital is very large.
There's a lot of unused money
The former refers to the number of... While the latter refers to uncountable nouns
It's also plural
It's also singular, because no matter how many plural nouns are added after it, its central meaning is still amount, so it's singular.
If the head is singular, the predicate verb will use the singular; if the head is plural, the predicate verb will use the plural; if the head is connected by and, the predicate verb will use the plural. Just remember this principle. ... unfold
It's also singular, because no matter how many plural nouns are added after it, its central meaning is still amount, so it's singular.
If the head is singular, the predicate verb will use the singular; if the head is plural, the predicate verb will use the plural; if the head is connected by and, the predicate verb will use the plural. Just remember this principle. Put it away
singular
The difference between them is that amount is used for uncountable nouns, which means "quantity"; number is used for countable nouns, which means "number".
Is an amount of followed by a noun singular or plural
When an amount of, the amount of, a great deal of is used as the subject, is the predicate singular or plural
The subject of the amount of is amount, so the predicate verb is singular
The subject of an amount of and a great deal of is followed by a noun as if it were followed by a noun plural predicate verb plural, which seems to be the same as the usage of number
Is the predicate verb of a amount of and the amount of singular or plural
The amount of refers to the specific quantity of an object, which is usually followed by a noun to indicate the quantity of. The predicate verb is singular
Hey，
A amount of is used as an adjective, which can be followed by a countable noun or an uncountable noun, so the predicate verb is determined according to the noun
“the amount of。。。” The amount of students in our class is 50
If it is used as other components, it depends on the subject
Hey，
A amount of is used as an adjective, which can be followed by a countable noun or an uncountable noun, so the predicate verb is determined according to the noun
“the amount of。。。” The amount of students in our class is 50
If it is used as other components, it depends on the subject, which is defined according to the singular and plural of the subject. For example, the benefits of reducing the amount of labs are a and B
Can a rational number be decomposed into the quotient of two coprime positive integers
I asked for a question,
Proof: root 2 is irrational
Suppose you don't understand,
Yes, because the quotient of two coprime positive integers is fraction, and fraction and rational number correspond one by one
When two gerunds are used as subjects, does the predicate verb use the plural
Swimming and dancing are / is my hobbies?
Are
If two subjects connected by and denote the same concept, use the singular. If two concepts are plural, use the plural
Swimming and dancing are two things in the plural
quote:
a) When and connects two nouns or pronouns as subjects
A and B are divided into the following four situations:
i. When a and B denote different people, things or ideas, the predicate should be in the plural
Li Ming and Zhang Hua are good students.
Both the parents and the children are here.
II. A
quote:
a) When and connects two nouns or pronouns as subjects
A and B are divided into the following four situations:
i. When a and B denote different people, things or ideas, the predicate should be in the plural
Li Ming and Zhang Hua are good students.
Both the parents and the children are here.
II. When a and B denote the same person, thing or idea, the predicate should be singular
A journalist and author lives in the sixth flat.
The turner and fitter is under twenty-five.
When the subject is modified by words such as each, every, no, many, etc
Use the singular number for verbs
Each boy and each girl is invited.
Every boy and girl is invited.
No boy and no girl is there now.
When a and B are two inseparable things, the predicate verb is singular
A law and rule about protecting environment has been drawn up.
Bread and butter is nutrious
If √ 2 is a rational number, there must be √ 2 = P / Q (P, q are coprime positive integers)?
Why can root 2 be expressed as two coprime positive integers? How?
Because rational numbers can be expressed in the form of this reduced fraction, but irrational numbers can't, which is a common skill in number theory
I wish you progress in your study and hope you will adopt it
Do not know, welcome to ask
This is a counter argument. Let's assume that √ 2 is a rational number, because rational numbers are the general name of integers and fractions, and all rational numbers can be transformed into fractions. Question: the inference process is not tangled.... The point is, why can the root 2 be expressed as the ratio of two coprime positive integers?
A gerund phrase as the subject?
How many examples are there?
Classmate, you speak English. You can be the subject in English
such as
Reading is an art
running is good for health.
such as
Anxwering questions is good for your head!
Are there two irrational numbers with different absolute values whose square difference is a rational number? If so, please use the numbers related to √ 2 √ 3 √ 5 for example
The square of root 3 minus the square of root 2 = 1 is a rational number
Too many. The difference between rational numbers is rational numbers,
As long as you have non square numbers like 2 3 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 15,
They root irrational numbers,
All meet the requirements!
（√5）²-（√3）²=5-3=2
（√3）²-（√2）²=3-2=1
（√5）²-（√2）²=5-2=3
Or exchange the subtracted and the subtracted, and the result is negative
That's OK
Gerund as subject, predicate verb with singular, if two gerund as subject?
Is it singular or plural?
For example, going to bed early and getting up early
What if there were two things?
Use singular because it's a sentence: go to bed early and get up early
Going to bed early and getting up early does good to our health.
How to change irrational number into rational number
For example, the root 2, except for the power 2, or the power 2n
Is there any other way?
Is there any other way for root 3 to become rational except 3N power?
Irrational number, divided by irrational number, in addition to itself, divided by other irrational numbers can also be rational number?
Rational number: a number that can be accurately expressed as the ratio of two integers. It includes integers and commonly known fractions. This fraction can also be expressed as finite decimal or infinite circular decimal. This definition is applicable to decimal system and other carry systems (such as binary system)
For example, 3, - 98.11, 5.7272 7 / 22 are rational numbers
Rational number can also be divided into positive rational number, negative rational number and 0
All rational numbers form a set, that is, the set of rational numbers, which is represented by the bold letter Q. some more modern mathematics books are represented by the hollow letter Q
A rational number set is a subset of a real number set
The set of rational numbers is a field in which four operations (except divisor 0) can be performed. For these operations, the following operation laws hold (a, B, C, etc. all represent arbitrary rational numbers): the set of rational numbers is a field in which four operations (except divisor 0) can be performed
① The commutative law of addition a + B = B + A;
② The combination law of addition is a + (B + C) = (a + b) + C;
③ There is a number 0 such that 0 + a = a + 0 = a;
④ For any rational number a, there is an additive inverse, denoted as - A, such that a + (- a) = (- a) + a = 0;
⑤ The commutative law of multiplication AB = Ba;
⑥ The associative law of multiplication a (BC) = (AB) C;
⑦ Distribution law a (B + C) = AB + AC;
⑧ There is a multiplicative unit element 1 ≠ 0, such that 1A = A1 = a for any rational number a;
⑨ For a rational number a which is not zero, there exists the inverse element of multiplication 1 / A, such that a (1 / a) = (1 / a) a = 1
In addition, a rational number is an ordered field on which there exists an order relation
A rational number is still an Archimedean field, that is, for a and B, a ≥ 0, b > 0, we must find a natural number n, such that Nb > A. It is not difficult to infer that there is no maximum rational number
It is worth mentioning the name of rational number. The name of "rational number" is puzzling. Rational number is not more reasonable than other numbers. In fact, it seems to be a mistake in translation. The word "rational number" comes from the west, which is rational number in English, and rational usually means "rational", According to the Japanese translation method, it is translated into "rational number". However, this word comes from ancient Greece, and its English root is ratio, which means ratio (the root here is in English, and the Greek meaning is the same). Therefore, the meaning of this word is also very obvious, which is "ratio" of integer, Irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers